ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical course of acute appendicitis, one of the most common diseases needing surgical intervention in children, was affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The global fear and panic about the outbreak and governmental decisions on lockdowns and restrictions led to an increasing number of complicated forms of appendicitis. Objective(s): This study aimed to compare different aspects of appendicitis and its complications between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Method(s): In a retrospective cross-sectional analytical study, we enrolled all patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis for two consecutive years. Only children under 14 years of age were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the time of disease presentation, the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Demographic features, as well as clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings, were compared between the two groups. Result(s): Out of 369 patients included in the study, 173 were placed in the pre-pandemic group. There was no significant change in the incidence of appendicitis between the two periods (P = 0.232). However, the incidence of complicated appendicitis increased remarkably during the pandemic (27% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). No substantial differences were found in parameters like age, sex, laboratory findings, and the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.005). The patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had a significantly higher hospitalization duration (P < 0.001). Conclusion(s): Our results suggested that the rate of complicated appendicitis was substantially higher during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic time. Also, the proportion of midline laparotomy was significantly higher after the outbreak. These findings suggested that delays in care provision during the COVID-19 outbreak could have probably contributed to the rise in the incidence of complicated appendicitis in children. Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Background: Hospital-acquired infection with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a global concern. The administration of antibiotics among the infected and non-infected immunocompromised children with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with an increased risk of intestinal CRE colonization and bacteremia during hospitalization. Objective(s): The present study aimed to detect the correlation between the intestinal colonization of carbapenemase encoding Enterobacteriaceae with SARS-CoV-2 infection and antibiotic prescription among immunocompromised children admitted to the oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) wards. Method(s): Stool samples were collected from the immunocompromised children, and the members of Enterobacteriaceae were isolated using standard microbiological laboratory methods. Carbapenem resistance isolates were initially characterized by the disc diffusion method according to CLSI 2021 and further confirmed by the PCR assay. SARS-CoV-2 infection was also recorded according to documented real-time PCR results. Result(s): In this study, 102 Enterobacteriaceae isolates were collected from the stool samples. The isolates were from Escherichia spp. (59/102, 57.8%), Klebsiella spp. (34/102, 33.3%), Enterobacter spp. (5/102, 4.9%), Citrobacter spp. (2/102, 1.9%), and Serratia spp. (2/102, 1.9%). The carbapenem resistance phenotype was detected among 42.37%, 73.52%, 40%, 50%, and 100% of Escherichia spp., Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia spp., respectively. Moreover, blaOXA-48 (49.1%) and blaNDM-1 (29.4%), as well as blaVIM (19.6%) and blaKPC (17.6%) were common in the CRE isolates. SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 50% of the participants;however, it was confirmed in 65.45% (36/55) of the intestinal CRE carriers. The administration of antibiotics, mainly broad-spectrum antibiotics, had a significant correlation with the CRE colonization in both the infected and non-infected children with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion(s): Regardless of the COVID-19 status, prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic prescription are major risk factors associated with the CRE intestinal colonization in immunocompromised children. Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Context: This scoping review tries to synthesize early findings on the immunopathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 to assess the emerging therapies and vaccines by evaluating their impact based on the mechanism of pathogenicity. Methods: The three databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2020, to March 15, 2020. To extract the results from the studies, the content, thematic analysis method was used. In this method, the topics studied were coded in the articles, and then major topics related to the articles were determined. After identifying major issues, the contents of the articles were reviewed. Results: A total of 2,250 articles were retrieved after deleting duplications, and after reviewing the thematic relevance, 45 of them were selected for the final analysis. Topics studied in the articles were classified into four main areas, including “virus entry inhibi-tion and immune response”, “vaccine and treatment targets”, “genome structure similarity to other coronaviruses,” and “pathogen-sis”. Conclusions: Results of this review showed that we have a long way to develop an effective and safe vaccine due to the structural and behavioral complexities of this virus. In the meantime, the scientific community should use results of megatrials, but until their accomplishing them, we have to use results of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials.
ABSTRACT
The laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 should be done to confirm coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected patients. Although several diagnostic methods have been developed in this regard, their accuracy for clinical application is not very clear yet. To compare the diagnostic value of laboratory tests for the detection of COVID-19 infection, this study provides an upcoming review of the newly developed detection methods. Sensitivity, specificity, detection limit, and turn-around-time of these methods are compared and challenges for their application in clinical settings are reviewed. PubMed and Google Scholar web sites were used for the systematic search until April 9, 2020 to identify the published studies based on the following keywords: "Detection", "Coro-navirus 2019", "SARS-CoV-2", and "Sensitivity". Out of 526 results, a total of 54 articles, including 46 studies on detection methods, were considered eligible for the review. The results showed that most of the proposed tests focused on molecular methods, while immunological and point-of-care tests were investigated in 13 studies. There were also a few commercial automated methods for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples, most of which are not examined in the current review, as no data about their sensitivity and specificity were presented. Although the assessment of publication biases showed that 64% sensitivity and nearly 100% specificity for RT-PCR are close to reality, most of the related reports for serological methods are not valid and further studies are needed to confirm their utility in clinical settings. Moreover, the RT-PCR test alone cannot act as a gold standard because of bias in measurements. Therefore, antibody tests and other proposed methods could be used as supplementary diagnostic tests to improve RT-PCR accuracy. Although clinical findings are invaluable, in many cases, they can provide more valuable supportive data than serological tests. Copyright © 2020, Author(s).